5:26-cv-03325•Edwards (ID 2000062603) v. Cleaver et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS BENJAMIN A. EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 26-3325-JWL (FNU) CLEAVER, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is confined at the Lansing Correctional Facility in Lansing, Kansas. On August 31, 2026, the Court issued a notice of deficiency (Doc. 2) (“NOD”) ordering Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or submit a motion to proceed without prepayment of fees. The NOD provides that the failure to comply by September 30, 2026, may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Id. at 2. Plaintiff has not filed a response as of the date of this Order. Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “authorizes a district court, upon a defendant’s motion, to order the dismissal of an action for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or ‘a court order.’” Young v. United States, 316 F. App’x 764, 771 (10th Cir. 2009) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)). “This rule has been interpreted as permitting district courts to dismiss actions sua sponte when one of these conditions is met.” Id. (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630–31 (1962); Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003)). “In addition, it is well established in this circuit that a district court is Case 5:26-cv-03325-JWL Document 3 Filed 10/09/26 Page 1 of 2
2 not obligated to follow any particular procedures when dismissing an action without prejudice under Rule 41(b).” Young, 316 F. App’x at 771–72 (citations omitted). Plaintiff has failed to comply with the NOD by the Court’s deadline. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated October 9, 2026, in Kansas City, Kansas. S/ John W. Lungstrum JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 5:26-cv-03325-JWL Document 3 Filed 10/09/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.