Leigh v. CT Corporation System et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
CHAD KENYATTA LEIGH,
Plaintiff,
v.
CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, et al.,
Defendant.
Case No. 25-1247-TC-BGS
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED
WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees
filed by Plaintiff Chad Kenyatta Leigh, who is representing himself pro se. (Doc. 3, sealed.) The
motion requests leave for Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP motion”). (Id.) Plaintiff also
contemporaneously filed the requisite financial affidavit in support of his motion. (Doc. 3-1, sealed.)
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), a federal court may authorize commencement of a civil action
“without prepayment of fees or security therefor, by a person who submits an affidavit that … the
person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” To succeed on an IFP motion, “the
movant must show a financial inability to pay the required filing fees.” Lister v. Dep’t of Treasury, 408
F.3d 1309, 1312 (10th Cir. 2005). Proceeding IFP “in a civil case is a privilege, not a right –
fundamental or otherwise.” White v. Colorado, 157 F.3d 1226, 1233 (10th Cir. 1998). The decision to
grant or deny IFP status under § 1915 lies within the district court’s sound discretion. Engberg v.
Wyoming, 265 F.3d 1109, 1122 (10th Cir. 2001).
Based on the financial information provided by Plaintiff in his affidavit of financial status
(Doc. 3-1, sealed), the Court finds that Plaintiff has shown an inability to pay the filing fee. Thus,
the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion to proceed without prepayment of fees (Doc. 3). That stated,
Case 6:25-cv-01247-TC-BGS Document 6 Filed 11/13/25 Page 1 of 2

because of issues identified in Plaintiff’s Complaint, as discussed in the Court’s contemporaneously-
filed Show Cause Order, the Clerk’s office shall not proceed to issue summons in this case at this
time.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed without Prepayment
of Fees (Doc. 3, sealed) is GRANTED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), Plaintiff may
commence this action without prepayment of fees. The Clerk’s office shall not proceed to issue
summons in this case at this time absent further Order from the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated November 13, 2025, at Wichita, Kansas.
/S /BROOKS G. S EVERSON
Brooks G. Severson
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 6:25-cv-01247-TC-BGS Document 6 Filed 11/13/25 Page 2 of 2