Hamburg v. Rosso et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
KEVIN T. HAMBURG (#624781)
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
25-420-SDD-EWD
WILLIAM ROSSO.ETAL.
RULING
The Court has carefully considered the record, the law applicable to this action,
and the Report and Recommendation^ of United States Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-
Doomes dated December 10, 2025, to which a Motion for Reconsideration2 was filed.
The Court conducted a de novo review.
The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.
ACCORDINGLY,
IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure
to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A due to Plaintiff Kevin T.
Hamburg's failure to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit in this Court, as
required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED.
Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on this ^< day of
CHIEF JUDGE JS^ELLY D. DICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
1 Rec. Doc. 8.
2 Rec. Doc. 10.
Case 3:25-cv-00420-SDD-EWD Document 12 02/02/26 Page 1 of 1