2:25-cv-00650•GUZMAN JUNIOR v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY JAIL
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JESUS MIGUEL GUZMAN JUNIOR, Petitioner, v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:25-cv-00650-SDN ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION On January 2, 2026, the Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing Petitioner’s habeas petition after preliminary review pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), and Petitioner’s failure to follow certain procedural requirements. ECF No. 2. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. The time within which to file objections expired on January 16, 2026, and no objections have been filed, either before or after the deadline. The Court finds no clear error and agrees with the findings set forth in the Recommended Decision. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. ECF No. 2. The petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED. ECF No. 1. It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Case 2:25-cv-00650-SDN Document 3 Filed 01/27/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 S O ORDERED. Dated this 27th day of January, 2026. /s/ Stacey D. Neumann U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT J UDGE Case 2:25-cv-00650-SDN Document 3 Filed 01/27/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.