Khardy Enterprises LLC et al v. NCR Atelos Corporation et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
KHARDY ENTERPRISES LLC,
et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
NCR ATELOS CORPORATION,
et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 24-12797
Honorable Gershwin A. Drain
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford
ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER, TO
SUBMIT A JOINT LIST OF UNRESOLVED ISSUES,
AND TO APPEAR FOR A HEARING ON JANUARY 9, 2026
Defendants move to compel plaintiffs’ responses to interrogatories
and requests for production. ECF No. 25. The Honorable Gershwin A.
Drain referred the motion to the undersigned for hearing and determination
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). ECF No. 28. The Court afforded the
parties ample time to resolve the discovery disputes, but issues remain.
ECF No. 51. In October 2025, the Court ordered the parties to meet and
confer and to submit a joint list of unresolved issues by December 1, 2025.
ECF No. 52. But during a December 5, 2025 status conference, the parties
stated that they needed more time, although they have made progress.
Case 2:24-cv-12797-GAD-EAS ECF No. 61, PageID.<pageID> Filed 12/08/25 Page 1 of 3

2
The Court will hold a hearing by Zoom on January 9, 2026 at 11:00
a.m. 	Before the hearing, the parties must meet and confer in good faith
in person or by video as required by E.D. Mich. LR 37.1. Following the
meeting, and by January 5, 2025, the parties must file a joint list of
unresolved issues that addresses the relevance and proportionality of the
disputed discovery requests and that comports with the guidance set out in
the Court’s August 2025 meet-and-confer order. ECF No. 34.
No more extensions will be granted.
s/Elizabeth A. Stafford
ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD
United States Magistrate Judge
Dated: December 8, 2025
NOTICE TO PARTIES ABOUT OBJECTIONS
Within 14 days of being served with this order, any party may file
objections with the assigned district judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The
district judge may sustain an objection only if the order is clearly erroneous
or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636. 	“When an objection is filed to a
magistrate judge’s ruling on a non-dispositive motion, the ruling
remains in full force and effect unless and until it is stayed by the
magistrate judge or a district judge.” 	E.D. Mich. LR 72.2.
Case 2:24-cv-12797-GAD-EAS ECF No. 61, PageID.<pageID> Filed 12/08/25 Page 2 of 3

3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that this document was served on counsel
of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to
their email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of
Electronic Filing on December 8, 2025.
s/Davon Allen
DAVON ALLEN
Case Manager
Case 2:24-cv-12797-GAD-EAS ECF No. 61, PageID.<pageID> Filed 12/08/25 Page 3 of 3