2:24-cv-13307•West Village Michigan, LLC v. Tayler et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WEST VILLAGE MICHIGAN, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CANDICE TAYLER, et al., Defendants. Case No. 24-cv-13307 Honorable David M. Lawson Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford ORDER STRIKING FILING (ECF NO. 35) AND RESOLVING PENDING MOTIONS (ECF NOS. 31, 34, 33) Plaintiff West Village Michigan, LLC, sues Defendants Candice Tayler and Powerful Sky Real Estate Management, LLC, for alleged violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), conversion, fraud, and misappropriation. ECF No. 1. The Honorable David M. Lawson referred the case to the undersigned for all pretrial matters under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ECF No. 11. The parties filed several motions, and the Court held a status conference on December 8, 2025. Case 2:24-cv-13307-DML-EAS ECF No. 36, PageID.<pageID> Filed 12/10/25 Page 1 of 4
2 Tayler’s attorney, Richard Delonis, moved to withdraw as counsel because of a breakdown of the attorney-client relationship. ECF No. 33. The Court GRANTS Delonis’s motion. Tayler moved for appointment of counsel, claiming that she cannot afford one. ECF No. 34. As explained during the conference, in civil cases, “there are no funds appropriated to pay a lawyer or to even reimburse a lawyer’s expense.” Clarke v. Blais, 473 F. Supp. 2d 124, 125 (D. Me. 2007). Her motion is thus DENIED. While Tayler may proceed pro se on her own behalf, she may not represent Powerful Sky. See Bischoff v. Waldorf, 660 F. Supp. 2d 815, 820 (E.D. Mich. 2009) (“A corporation must appear by counsel or not at all.”). If Tayler fails to retain an attorney for Powerful Sky within 30 days, West Village may seek the appropriate relief against Power Sky. Tayler also filed a proposed consent judgment setting out a settlement offer. ECF No. 35. That document is an improper filing and is STRICKEN.1 1 Because the parties agreed during the status conference that they wished to engage in settlement discussions, the Court contacted the pro se clinic to address whether it would assist Tayler with those discussions. The pro se clinic agreed to help Tayler if she qualifies for its assistance. Tayler should contact the pro se clinic by email at proseclinic@udmercy.edu to apply for its assistance. Case 2:24-cv-13307-DML-EAS ECF No. 36, PageID.<pageID> Filed 12/10/25 Page 2 of 4
3 Last, West Village moved to compel defendants’ production of documents, including text messages and emails, bank account statements, and tax returns. ECF No. 31, PageID.112. West Village’s motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. As stated during the conference, Tayler must produce by December 31, 2025: • Text messages with Stella; • Text messages and emails with Younnes, Mroueh, Abbas, Dwaik, and Moaaz; and • Full bank records from 2024 and 2025 for accounts ending in 0050 and 6282. Tayler’s supplemental production must include an updated discovery response signed as required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(g). Tayler already produced her tax return for 2024, ECF No. 31, PageID.112, and the Court denies West Village’s request for her to produce tax return records for other years. The Court also extends the scheduling order by 30 days. Discovery must be completed by January 28, 2026, and dispositive motions must be filed by March 2, 2026. s/Elizabeth A. Stafford ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD United States Magistrate Judge Case 2:24-cv-13307-DML-EAS ECF No. 36, PageID.<pageID> Filed 12/10/25 Page 3 of 4
4 Dated: December 10, 2025 NOTICE TO PARTIES ABOUT OBJECTIONS Within 14 days of being served with this order, any party may file objections with the assigned district judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The district judge may sustain an objection only if the order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636. “When an objection is filed to a magistrate judge’s ruling on a non-dispositive motion, the ruling remains in full force and effect unless and until it is stayed by the magistrate judge or a district judge.” E.D. Mich. LR 72.2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that this document was served on counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on December 10, 2025. s/Davon Allen DAVON ALLEN Case Manager Case 2:24-cv-13307-DML-EAS ECF No. 36, PageID.<pageID> Filed 12/10/25 Page 4 of 4
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.