William-Dennis v. Haw et al

2:25-cv-12893Mied14.11.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WILLIAM DENNIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONNA HAW, et al.
Defendants.
Case No. 25-cv-12893
Honorable Robert J. White
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Before the Court is William Dennis’s motion for reconsideration of the
October 14, 2025 order dismissing his pro se complaint for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 10-11). The Court will decide the motion without a hearing
pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(h)(3).
Because Dennis fails to demonstrate “(1) a clear error of law; (2) newly
discovered evidence; (3) an intervening change in controlling law; or (4) a need to
prevent manifest injustice” that would alter the Court’s prior decision,
reconsideration of the dismissal order is unwarranted. Betts v. Costco Wholesale
Corp., 558 F.3d 461, 474 (6th Cir. 2009) (quotation omitted). Accordingly,
Case 2:25-cv-12893-RJW-CI ECF No. 18, PageID.<pageID> Filed 11/14/25 Page 1 of 2
2
IT IS ORDERED that Dennis’s motion for reconsideration of the October 14,
2025 order dismissing his pro se complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
(ECF No. 11) is denied.
Dated: November 14, 2025 s/ Robert J. White
Robert J. White
United States District Judge
Case 2:25-cv-12893-RJW-CI ECF No. 18, PageID.<pageID> Filed 11/14/25 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.