2:25-cv-12893•William-Dennis v. Haw et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM DENNIS, Plaintiff, v. DONNA HAW, et al. Defendants. Case No. 25-cv-12893 Honorable Robert J. White ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Before the Court is William Dennis’s motion for reconsideration of the October 14, 2025 order dismissing his pro se complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 10-11). The Court will decide the motion without a hearing pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(h)(3). Because Dennis fails to demonstrate “(1) a clear error of law; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) an intervening change in controlling law; or (4) a need to prevent manifest injustice” that would alter the Court’s prior decision, reconsideration of the dismissal order is unwarranted. Betts v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 558 F.3d 461, 474 (6th Cir. 2009) (quotation omitted). Accordingly, Case 2:25-cv-12893-RJW-CI ECF No. 18, PageID.<pageID> Filed 11/14/25 Page 1 of 2
2 IT IS ORDERED that Dennis’s motion for reconsideration of the October 14, 2025 order dismissing his pro se complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (ECF No. 11) is denied. Dated: November 14, 2025 s/ Robert J. White Robert J. White United States District Judge Case 2:25-cv-12893-RJW-CI ECF No. 18, PageID.<pageID> Filed 11/14/25 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.