1:25-cv-00320•Ludwick v. Clinton, County of et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHEALA MICHELLE LUDWICK, Plaintiff, v. CLINTON COUNTY, et al., Defendants. __________________________/ Case No. 1:25-cv-320 HON. JANE M. BECKERING ORDER This is a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Dawn Thelen filed a Motion to Dismiss, and Alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 30). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 38) on November 26, 2025, recommending that this Court grant the motion1 and dismiss Defendant Thelen from this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on all parties that have appeared to date. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 38) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 30) is GRANTED. Defendant Thelen is DISMISSED from this action. Dated: December 16, 2025 /s/ Jane M. Beckering JANE M. BECKERING United States District Judge 1 The Magistrate Judge considered the Motion to Dismiss, and Alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 30) as a motion for summary judgment (see ECF No. 38 at PageID.201). Case 1:25-cv-00320-JMB-SJB ECF No. 40, PageID.<pageID> Filed 12/16/25 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.