1:23-cv-00618•HOLMAN v. WIGGS et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA QUENTON D. HOLMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:23-cv-618 ) A.T. WIGGS, N.C. ALE Special ) Agent, K. KLUTTZ, N.C. ALE ) Special Agent, and UNIDENTIFIED ) DUKE CAMPUS POLICE OFFICER, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER On February 4, 2026, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 38, 39.) No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by Section 636. Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, (Doc. 38), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 33), is DENIED. Case 1:23-cv-00618-WO-LPA Document 40 Filed 03/05/26 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - This the 5th day of March, 2026. __________________________________ United States District Judge Case 1:23-cv-00618-WO-LPA Document 40 Filed 03/05/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.