1:24-cv-00553•DIAMOND v. WALKER et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
MARTIN RUSSELL DIAMOND,
Plaintiff,
V. 1:24-CV-00553
SERGEANT MR. WALKER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
On January 30, 2026, the United States Magistrate Judge's Memorandum Opinion
and Recommendation ("Recommendation") was filed, and notice was served on the
parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Dkts. 31, 32). No objections were filed within the
time limits prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 636. Therefore, the Court need not make a de nova
review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation
(Dkt. 31) is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for
Case 1:24-cv-00553-LAF-LPA Document 34 Filed 03/10/26 Page 1 of 2Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies (Dkt. 22) is DENIED. The Court directs that the Clerk refer this matter to the Magistrate Judge for imposition of a Scheduling Order . This the 10th day of March, 2026. ~ E ~ ~c:?~ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 Case 1:24-cv-00553-LAF-LPA Document 34 Filed 03/10/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.