WENDT v. ANDERSON et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SAMUEL CLEMENT WENDT, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	1:25CV16
)
WARDEN BENJAMIN ANDERSON, et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
ORDER
On 	February 	5, 	2026, 	the 	United 	States 	Magistrate 	Judge’s
Order, Opinion and Recommendation was filed and notice was served
on 	the 	parties 	in 	accordance 	with 	28 	U.S.C. 	§ 	636(b). 	Objections
were filed within the time limits prescribed by section 636. 	(Doc.
49.)
The 	court 	has 	appropriately 	reviewed 	the 	portions 	of 	the
Magistrate 	Judge’s 	report 	to 	which 	objections 	were 	made 	and 	has
made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s
report. 	The 	court 	therefore 	adopts 	the 	Magistrate 	Judge’s
Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants’ motions
to 	dismiss 	or 	transfer 	venue 	(Docs. 	13, 	21, 	30) 	are 	DENIED 	and
that 	Wendt’s 	North 	Carolina 	constitutional 	law 	claims 	and 	his
claims asserted on behalf of other inmates are DISMISSED.
/s/ 	Thomas D. Schroeder
March 26, 2026 	United States District Judge
Case 1:25-cv-00016-TDS-JGM Document 53 Filed 03/26/26 Page 1 of 1