1:25-cv-00018•MERIS v. ISHEE
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CLYDE JUNIOR MERIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:25CV18 ) TODD ISHEE, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER On December 2, 2025, the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on the parties in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. 19.) The court has carefully reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s report. The court finds that the objections do not change the substance of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, and the court therefore adopts the Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 8) be GRANTED, that Petitioner’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 14) and motion for appointment of a special master (Doc. 15) both be DENIED, that the Petition (Doc. 3) be DISMISSED and in the alternative DENIED, that Judgment be entered dismissing this action, and that, there being neither a Case 1:25-cv-00018-TDS-JLW Document 20 Filed 01/15/26 Page 1 of 2
2 substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability not issue. /s/ Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge January 15, 2026. Case 1:25-cv-00018-TDS-JLW Document 20 Filed 01/15/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.