HINTON v. HEAD MEDICAL PHYSICIAN et al

1:25-cv-00918Ncmd12.01.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	1:25CV918
)
HEAD MEDICAL PHYSICIAN, et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
ORDER
On 	October 	14, 	2025, 	the 	United 	States 	Magistrate 	Judge’s
Order 	and 	Recommendation 	was 	filed 	and 	notice 	was 	served 	on 	the
parties 	in 	accordance 	with 	28 	U.S.C. 	§ 	636(b). 	Objections 	were
filed within the time limits prescribed by section 636. 	(Doc. 4.)
The 	court 	has 	appropriately 	reviewed 	the 	portions 	of 	the
Magistrate 	Judge’s 	report 	to 	which 	objections 	were 	made 	and 	has
made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s
report. 	The 	court 	therefore 	adopts 	the 	Magistrate 	Judge’s
Recommendation.
IT 	IS 	THEREFORE 	ORDERED 	that 	this 	action 	is 	dismissed 	sua
sponte 	without 	prejudice 	to 	Plaintiff 	filing 	a 	new 	complaint, 	on
the 	proper 	§ 	1983 	forms, 	which 	corrects 	the 	defects 	noted 	by 	the
Magistrate Judge.
/s/ 	Thomas D. Schroeder
United States District Judge
January 12, 2026
Case 1:25-cv-00918-TDS-LPA Document 6 Filed 01/12/26 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.