USA v. Morris et al

3:03-cr-00016Ncwd15.12.2011

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Case 3:03-cr-00016-MU Document 161 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 1

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

AQ 247 (NC/W 11/11) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Western District of North Carolina

United States of America

v. )
Brent Michael Green ent ney oe 4
Date of Original Judgment: December 16, 2003 )
Date of Last Amended )
Judgment: January 4, 2010 ) Charles Brewer

Defendant's Attorney
Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(¢)(2)

Upon motion of ii the defendant O the Director of the Bureau of Prisons © the court under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c){(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10
and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
m@ DENIED. oO GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in
the last judgment issued) of a is reduced to

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Original Offense Level: 37 Amended Offense Level: 35
Criminal History Category: HT Criminal History Category: TI
Original Guideline Range: 235 to 293 months Amended Guideline Range: 188 to 235 months

Il, SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

C] The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

CO) The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time

of sentencing and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range.

C) The reduced sentence is above-the amended guideline range.

Mi Other (explain): The application of Amendment 750 provides no change in the guideline calculations in this case.
(The guideline calculations remain the same after Amendment 706 was applied and the defendant
received a reduction to 143 months custody on January 4, 2010.)

Il. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Ff IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: December 5, 2011

Effective Date: f2 = J of ~ / {

(if different from order date}

INFORMATION

GPO

ia) Case 3:03-cr-00016-MU Document161 _ Filed 12/15/11 Pagei1of1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.