USA v. Addison et al

3:17-cr-00134Ncwd10.06.2022

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:17-cr-134-FDW-DSC-72
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. )
) ORDER
ISAIAH DEVON STALLWORTH, )
)
Defendant. )
____________________________________ )
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant’s pro se Motion Pursuant to Rule
6 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings [Doc. 2399].
In his Motion, dated January 28, 2019, the Defendant seeks two docket entries from this
case “to assist [him] in exercising [his] rights to collaterally attack [his] detention pursuant to
Section § 2255….” [Doc. 2399 at 1]. The Motion is moot because the Defendant subsequently
filed a Motion to Vacate, Case No. 3:19-cv-495-FDW, which has now been dismissed and denied.
[Doc. 2798]; see also United States v. Stallworth, 809 F. App’x 179 (4th Cir. 2020), cert. denied
141 S.Ct. 2524 (2021). Accordingly, the instant Motion is denied as moot.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant’s pro se Motion Pursuant to Rule 6 of
the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings [Doc. 2399] is DENIED AS MOOT.
Signed: June 10, 2022
Case 3:17-cr-00134-FDW-MTO Document 3364 Filed 06/10/22 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.