5:05-cr-00009•USA v. Eckles et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION DOCKET NO.: 5:05CR9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Plaintiff ) vs. ) ) ORDER CHARLES REGINALD ECKLES, ) Defendant. ) ) _________________________________________ ) THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT upon the receipt of a letter, dated June 26, 2005, from Charles Reginald Eckles, to United States Magistrate Judge Carl Horn (the “Letter”). In the Letter, Mr. Eckles, who is currently in custody, asks for a bond review hearing. The record reflects that Mr. Eckles is represented by retained counsel, J. Brantley Ostwalt, Jr. It is the practice of this Court, when a defendant is represented by counsel, to rule on motions filed only by counsel of record. Therefore, if Mr. Eckles has any matters he wishes this Court to consider, they must be submitted through his attorney. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Mr. Eckles’ request for a bond review hearing is DENIED without prejudice to his right to re-file the motion, if appropriate, through his attorney, Mr. Ostwalt. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of the Letter to Mr. Ostwalt along with his copy of this Order. Case 5:05-cr-00009-MEO-DCK Document 258 Filed 07/11/05 Page 1 of 2
Signed: July 11, 2005 Case 5:05-cr-00009-MEO-DCK Document 258 Filed 07/11/05 Page 2 of 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION DOCKET NO.: 5:05CR9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff VS. ORDER CHARLES REGINALD ECKLES, Defendant. of THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT upon the receipt of a letter, dated June 26, 2005, from Charles Reginald Eckles, to United States Magistrate Judge Carl Horn (the “Letter’). In the Letter, Mr. Eckles, who is currently in custody, asks for a bond review hearing. The record reflects that Mr. Eckles is represented by retained counsel, J. Brantley Ostwallt, Jr. It is the practice of this Court, when a defendant is represented by counsel, to rule on motions filed only by counsel of record. Therefore, if Mr. Eckles has any matters he wishes this Court to consider, they must be submitted through his attorney. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Mr. Eckles’ request for a bond review hearing is DENIED without prejudice to his right to re-file the motion, if appropriate, through his attorney, Mr. Ostwalt. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of the Letter to Mr. Ostwalt along with his copy of this Order. INFORMATION GPO pe 5:05-cr-O0009-MEO-DCK Document 258 Filed 07/11/05 Page1of2 Signed: July 11, 2005 Dac David C. Keesler United States Magistrate Judge Case 5:05-cr-O0009-MEO-DCK Document 258 Filed 07/11/05 Page 2 of 2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.