Nadeau v. Shipman et al

1:17-cv-00074Ndd08.01.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Diana Nadeau, individually and on behalf )
of the next-of-kin of John Nadeau, )
)
Plaintiff, ) ORDER
)
vs. )
) Case No. 1-17-cv-74
David Shipman, in his individual and )
official capacities as Morton County Sheriff;)
Deborah Addy, in her individual capacity; )
Boyd Addy, in his individual capacity; Tina )
George, in her individual capacity; John )
Does 1-2, in their individual capacities as )
Morton County correctional officers; John )
Does 3-4, in their individual capacities as )
Morton County Correctional Center medical )
Staff, and Morton County, )
)
Defendants. )
Before the court is a Motion to Strike Certain Affirmative Defenses filed by Plaintiff Diana
Nadeau. (Doc. No. 15). Also before the court is a Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer and
Jury Demand by Morton County and David Shipman. (Doc. No. 36). As the court understands it,
Morton County and Shipman’s proposed amended answer eliminates the affirmative defenses to
which Nadeau initially took exception and Nadeau does not object to this amending. (Doc. No. 38).
Accordingly, the court GRANTS Morton County and Shipman’s Motion for Leave to File Amended
Answer and Jury Demand. (Doc. No. 36). Such amended answer shall be filed by January 16, 2018.
With that amending, the court FINDS AS MOOT Nadeau’s Motion to Strike. (Doc. No. 15).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Case 1:17-cv-00074-DMT-CRH Document 40 Filed 01/08/18 Page 1 of 2
Dated this 8th day of January, 2018.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Case 1:17-cv-00074-DMT-CRH Document 40 Filed 01/08/18 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.