Kuntz v. AAA Collections, Inc.

1:18-cv-00017Ndd18.04.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Riley S. Kuntz, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	) 	ORDER
)
vs. 	)
)
AAA Collections, Inc., 	) 	Case No. 1:18-cv-017
)
Defendant. 	)
Plaintiff Riley S. Kuntz (“Kuntz”) initiated the above-entitled action pro se on January 26,
2018. (Doc. No. 1). He filed notice of his consent to the undersigned’s exercise of jurisdiction on
February 1, 2018. 	(Doc. 	No. 	4). 	He next filed a “Stipulation for Order of Dismissal with
Prejudice” (Doc. No. 5) on April 10, 2018. As no one has entered an appearance on defendant’s
behalf or otherwise executed the “stipulation”on defendant’s behalf, the court shall construe the
“stipulation” filed by Kuntz as a notice of voluntarily dismissal. 	Accordingly, the court
DISMISSES the above-entitled action with prejudice and without costs to either party.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 18th day of April, 2018.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
Case 1:18-cv-00017-CSM Document 6 Filed 04/18/18 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.