Churchill v. Marathon Petroleum Company LP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Timothy Churchill, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
vs. 	)
)
)
Marathon Petroleum Company LP, 	)
)
ORDER FOR RULE 26(f) PLANNING
MEETING AND RULE 16(b)
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE,
AND ORDER RE RESOLUTION
OF DISCOVERY DISPUTES
Case No.: 1:20-cv-192
Defendant. 	)
______________________________________________________________________________
IT IS ORDERED:
RULE 26(f) MEETING & RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
The court shall hold a Rule 16(b) initial pretrial scheduling/discovery conference at 9:30 a.m.
on January 5, 2021. To participate in the conference, counsel shall call the following number and
enter the following access code:
Tel. No.: (877) 810-9415
Access Code: 8992581
In preparation for the conference, counsel are directed to confer in accordance with Rule
26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Counsel shall submit to the magistrate judge a joint
proposed scheduling/discovery plan that reflects the Rule 26(f) discussions and includes at least
those 	items 	listed 	in 	form 	Scheduling/Discovery 	Plan 	posted 	on 	the 	court's 	website
(www.ndd.uscourts.gov/forms/). Counsel shall confer, complete and prepare the form, obtain the
appropriate signatures, and e-mail the document in "WordPerfect" or in "Word" format to ndd_J-
Hochhalter@ndd.uscourts.gov NO LATER THAN TWO BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE
CONFERENCE. 	Any disagreements among counsel shall be addressed at the scheduling
1
Case 1:20-cv-00192-CRH Document 10 Filed 11/30/20 Page 1 of 3

conference.
During the Rule 26(f) meeting, counsel shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and
defenses, the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, and the scope and type
of discovery, including electronic discovery. Counsel shall also make or arrange for the disclosures
required by Rule 26(a)(1), and develop their joint proposed scheduling/discovery plan. These are
only the minimum requirements for the meeting. Counsel are encouraged to have a comprehensive
discussion and are required to approach the meeting cooperatively and in good faith. The discussion
of claims and defenses shall be a substantive, meaningful discussion. In addressing settlement or
early resolution of the case, counsel are required to explore the feasibility of ADR not only between
themselves but with their clients as well. If the parties elect not to participate in an early ADR
effort, the court may nonetheless require a settlement conference shortly before trial.
In addressing the Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures, counsel shall discuss the appropriate timing,
form, scope or requirement of the initial disclosures, keeping in mind that Rule 26(a)(1)
contemplates the disclosures will be made by the date of the Rule 16(b) initial scheduling conference
and will include at least the categories of information listed in the rule. Rule 26 affords the parties
flexibility in the scope, form and timing of disclosures under both Rule 26(a)(1) (initial disclosures)
and Rule 26(a)(2) (expert witness disclosures), but the parties’ agreement on disclosures is subject
to approval by the court. In their discussion of disclosures, counsel shall address issues of relevance
in detail, with each party identifying what it needs and why. The discussion shall include as well
the sequence and timing of follow-up discovery, including whether that discovery should be
conducted informally or formally and whether it should be conducted in phases to prepare for filing
of particular motions or for settlement discussions.
In addressing electronic discovery, counsel shall discuss what electronic sources each party
2
Case 1:20-cv-00192-CRH Document 10 Filed 11/30/20 Page 2 of 3

will search, difficulty of retrieval, preservation of records, the form of production (electronic or
hard-copy, format of production, inclusion of meta-data, etc.), cost of production and which party
will bear the cost, privilege/waiver issues, and any other electronic discovery issues present in the
case. Before engaging in the Rule 26 discussion, counsel should determine who is most familiar
with the client's computer system, what electronic records the client maintains, how the client's
electronic records are stored, the difficulty/ease of retrieving various records, the existence and
terms of the client's document retention/destruction policy, and whether the client has placed a
"litigation hold" preventing destruction of potentially relevant records.
The deadlines in the scheduling/discovery plan shall be mutually agreeable, with a view to
achieving resolution of the case with a minimum of expense and delay. 	At the Rule 16(b)
conference, the court will review the plan with counsel. The date for the dispositive motion deadline
shall not be later than January 10, 2022, unless good cause is shown at the scheduling conference
for a later date. Counsel are informed that the dispositive motion deadline is used in assigning the
trial date, and the court must allow adequate time for briefing and ruling prior to the final pretrial
conference and trial dates.
Dated this 30th day of November, 2020.
/s/ Clare R. Hochhalter
Clare R. Hochhalter, Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
3
Case 1:20-cv-00192-CRH Document 10 Filed 11/30/20 Page 3 of 3