1:25-cr-00231•USA v. Brown et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA United States of America, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ) vs. ) ) Case No. 1:25-cr-231 Elliot Figueroa Soto, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ On June 4, 2026, Defendant filed a Motion to Direct US Marshal to Allow Evaluations. (Doc. No. 28). According to Defendant, he was endeavoring to arrange for a chemical dependency evaluation with the Prairie Recovery Center, presumably by telephone as he is presently in custody at the McLean County Jail. He was informed by staff at the McLean County Jail that they have been instructed to refuse evaluation requests by federal detainees unless authorized by the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”). He thereafter contacted the USMS and submitted an evaluation request via email as directed but has yet to receive a response. Averring that his evaluation is a private matter and there is no reason why he should be required to contact the USMS to schedule it, he seeks an order from the court directing the USMS to allow him to participate in a substance abuse evaluation and any physical required as part of that evaluation. The court appreciates the frustration encountered by Defendant when trying to schedule his telephonic evaluation. The court also appreciates the responsibilities that the USMS has as Defendant’s custodian. As Defendant is in USMS custody, the USMS’s involvement in the scheduling of Defendant’s evaluation is neither surprising nor unreasonable. Arranging the telephonic evaluation of someone in USMS custody can generally be 1 Case 1:25-cr-00231-DMT Document 29 Filed 06/12/26 Page 1 of 2
accomplished without court involvement. In this instance, there appears to have been a breakdown in communication. To ensure that Defendant can schedule an evaluation, the court GRANTS his motion (Doc. No. 28). Defendant shall coordinate with the USMS in scheduling a chemical dependency evaluation. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 12th day of June, 2026. /s/ Clare R. Hochhalter Clare R. Hochhalter, Magistrate Judge United States District Court 2 Case 1:25-cr-00231-DMT Document 29 Filed 06/12/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.