USA v. Titsworth et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
KEITH TITSWORTH,
Defendants.
8:25CR187
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Pretrial
Motions, (Filing No. 59). The motion is unopposed by the government. For good cause shown, the Court
finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Pretrial Motions, (Filing No. 59),
is granted.
2) Pretrial motions shall be filed by December 1, 2025.
3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of justice will
be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant
in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that
is, the time between October 31, 2025, and December 1, 2025, shall be deemed excludable
time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to
grant this motion would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective
preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and
complexity of the case. The failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of
justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided
under this court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time
should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
4) No further extensions will be granted without a showing of particular good cause and
without requesting a hearing before the undersigned magistrate judge.
Dated this 3rd day of November, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Ryan C. Carson
United States Magistrate Judge
8:25-cr-00187-BCB-RCC Doc # 60 Filed: 11/03/25 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID #
<pageID>