USA v. Titsworth et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JOHN RODDY,
Defendant.
8:25CR187
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Second Motion to Extend
Pretrial Motion Deadline, (Filing No. 61). 	For good cause shown, the Court finds the motion
should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) 	Defendant’s Unopposed Second Motion to Extend Pretrial Motion Deadline,
(Filing No. 61), is granted.
2) 	Pretrial motions shall be filed by February 23, 2026.
3) 	In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of
justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the
public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result
of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between November 24, 2025 and
February 23, 2026, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time
under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would
deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into
account the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case.
The failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C.
§ 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this
court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time should
not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
4) 	No further extensions will be granted without a showing of particular good cause
and without requesting a hearing before the undersigned magistrate judge.
Dated this 21st day of November, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Ryan C. Carson
United States Magistrate Judge
8:25-cr-00187-BCB-RCC Doc # 62 Filed: 11/21/25 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID #
<pageID>