1:16-cv-00434•Czekalski v. Cheshire County et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jason A. Czekalski v. Civil No. 16-cv-434-LM Cheshire County and Richard Van Wickler REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the court in this removal action is a motion to remand (Doc. No. 6). Defendants initiated this action in this court by filing a notice of removal (Doc. No. 1), noting that the complaint (Doc. No. 1-1) cites federal law and asserts claims that appear to fall within this court’s federal question jurisdiction. Plaintiff moved to remand (Doc. No. 6), asserting that he intends to rely on state law causes of action for all of his claims, and that the complaint cites federal law only by analogy. Defendants, through counsel, and plaintiff, pro se, appeared at a hearing on November 30, 2016, on the motion to remand. Plaintiff maintained in the hearing that the complaint is intended to assert only state law claims. Plaintiff stipulated on the record to the dismissal of any federal claims in the case with prejudice. Upon construing the complaint liberally, in light of plaintiff’s filings and oral statements, the court concludes Case 1:16-cv-00434-LM Document 11 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 2
2 that there are no federal claims in the case. The case is appropriately remanded. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c); see also Robinson v. Roberts, No. 5:15-cv-512-DCN-KDW, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49463, at *9 (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2015), R&R adopted, No. 5:15-cv-0512 DCN, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50335 (D.S.C. Apr. 14, 2015). Accordingly, the district judge should grant the motion to remand (Doc. No. 6). Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the district judge should grant the motion to remand (Doc. No. 6), and the case should be remanded to the Merrimack County Superior Court. Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court’s order. See Garayalde-Rijos v. Mun. of Carolina, 747 F.3d 15, 21-22 (1st Cir. 2014). __________________________ Andrea K. Johnstone United States Magistrate Judge November 30, 2016 cc: Jason A. Czelkalski, pro se John A. Curran, Esq. Case 1:16-cv-00434-LM Document 11 Filed 11/30/16 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.