Laifer et al v. Social Security Administration Employees et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Warren Laifer and Gail Anne Laifer
v.
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting
Commissioner, Social Security
Administration; New Hampshire
Department of Health and Human
Services; and Shania Sanborn
Case No. 17-cv-425-PB
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated November 9, 2017, and dismiss all of plaintiffs’
claims other than their Social Security claim. 	“‘[O]nly those
issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's
report are subject to review in the district court and those not
preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” 	School
Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human
Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United
States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after
proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to
magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Paul Barbadoro
United States District Judge
Date: December 29, 2017
cc: Warren Laifer, pro se
Gail Anne Laifer, pro se
/s/ Paul Barbadoro
Case 1:17-cv-00425-PB Document 6 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 1