Laifer et al v. Social Security Administration Employees et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Warren Laifer and Gail Anne Laifer
v.
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting
Commissioner, Social Security
Administration; New Hampshire
Department of Health and Human
Services; and Shania Sanborn
Case No. 17-cv-425-PB
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated September 12, 2018, and dismiss the plaintiffs’
remaining claims for failure to exhaust. 	“‘[O]nly those issues
fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are
subject to review in the district court and those not preserved
by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” 	School Union No.
37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Paul Barbadoro
United States District Judge
Date: October 11, 2018
cc: Warren Laifer, pro se
Gail Anne Laifer, pro se
/s/ Paul Barbadoro
Case 1:17-cv-00425-PB Document 8 Filed 10/11/18 Page 1 of 1