1:18-cv-00508•Rodriguez v. Khanal et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Orlando Rodriguez v. Deo Khanal, Rustic Crust, Kathleen Hammel, Dan Muskat and Doug Troy Case No. 18-cv-508-SM ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated December 21, 2018. Counts 1 through 11 of the complaint are dismissed and the case will proceed on plaintiff’s wrongful termination claim for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). ____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge Date: February 11, 2019 Cc: Orlando Rodriguez, pro se Daniel P. Schwarz, Esq. Case 1:18-cv-00508-SM Document 12 Filed 02/11/19 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.