Lath v. PennyMac Loan Services LLC et al

1:18-cv-00928Nhd24.06.2019

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Sanjeev Lath
v.
PennyMac Loan Services LLC, et al
Case No. 18-cv-928-PB
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated June 4,
2019 . PennyMac’s partial motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc.
no. 15) is granted as to Count 1 and denied as to Counts 2 and 3.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848
F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to
file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right
to appeal).
____________________________
Paul J. Barbadoro
United States District Judge
Date: June 24, 2019
cc: Sanjeev Lath, pro se
Counsel of Record
/s/ Paul J. Barbadoro
Case 1:18-cv-00928-PB Document 32 Filed 06/24/19 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.