Amatucci v. Young et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Josephine Amatucci
v.
Richard M. Young, Jr., et al
Case No. 18-cv-1227-SM-AJ
ORDER
No objections having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone
dated April 12, 2024, the motion to amend (doc. no. 281) is denied for
the reason set forth therein and the Report and Recommendation of
Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated April 12, 2024, the motion
for summary judgment (doc. no. 259), motion for hearing (doc. no.
268), second request – motion for expeditious jury trial (doc. no.
269) are denied for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those
issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are
subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by
such objection are precluded on appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting
Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st
Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6
(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific
objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
So Ordered.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: May 3, 2024
cc: 	Josephine Amatucci, pro se
Counsel of Record
Case 1:18-cv-01227-SM-AJ Document 288 Filed 05/03/24 Page 1 of 1