1:20-cv-00618•Roberts v. FCI Berlin
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Phillip Roberts v. Warden, FCI Berlin Case No. 20-cv-618-SE ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated March 23, 2022 (doc. no 17). Accordingly, the Warden’s motion to dismiss (doc. no. 14) is granted. The clerk shall enter judgment and close this case. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quotation omitted); see United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report waives the right to appeal district court’s order). SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Samantha D. Elliott United States District Judge Date: April 22, 2022 Case 1:20-cv-00618-SE Document 18 Filed 04/22/22 Page 1 of 2
cc: Phillip Roberts, pro se Seth R. Aframe, Esq. Case 1:20-cv-00618-SE Document 18 Filed 04/22/22 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.