Davis v. FCI Berlin, Warden

1:22-cv-00522Nhd26.12.2023

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Nathan Davis
v.
FCI Berlin, Warden
Case No. 22-cv-522-LM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone
dated October 16, 2023. 	“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the
objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the
district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded
on appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d
554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health &
Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United
States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper
notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report
will waive the right to appeal).
The clerk shall enter judgment and close the case.
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: December 26, 2023
cc: Nathan Davis, pro se
Heather Cherniske, Esq.
Case 1:22-cv-00522-LM Document 13 Filed 12/26/23 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.