1:22-cv-00527•McCoy v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Haleem McCoy v. FCI Berlin, Warden Case No. 22-cv-527-SE ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated May 30, 2023. The respondent’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 6), is denied without prejudice. Within thirty days the respondent shall file either: (1) a notice indicating that there are disputed facts and that an evidentiary hearing is necessary; or (2) a new motion for summary judgment based on current BOP policies and authorities, with reference to the petitioner’s recent sentence computation data. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see Case 1:22-cv-00527-SE-AJ Document 9 Filed 06/28/23 Page 1 of 2
also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). ____________________________ Samantha D. Elliott United States District Judge Date: June 28, 2023 Case 1:22-cv-00527-SE-AJ Document 9 Filed 06/28/23 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.