Akinsanya v. FCI Berlin, Warden

1:23-cv-00037Nhd26.05.2023

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Rasheed Akinsanya
v.
FCI Berlin, Warden
Case No. 23-cv-37-SE
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone
dated April 25, 2023, and deny the motion for summary judgment (Doc.
No. 13) as moot, and also dismiss this case as moot, see Francis v.
Maloney, 798 F.3d 33, 38 (1st Cir. 2015).
“[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate’s report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Sch.
Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir.
2010) (quotation omitted); see United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792
F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a
specific objection to magistrate’s report will waive the right to
appeal).
The clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case.
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Samantha D. Elliott
United States District Judge
Date: May 26, 2023
cc: Rasheed Akinsanya, pro se
Counsel of Record
Case 1:23-cv-00037-SE Document 20 Filed 05/26/23 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.