1:23-cv-00168•Suescun v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Pablo Emiliano Suescun v. FCI Berlin, Warden Case No. 23-cv-168-PB ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated June 29, 2023, grant the motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 6) and dismiss the petition without prejudice to the petitioner's ability to file a new petition after he has fully exhausted his BOP remedies. The clerk of court shall enter judgment and close the case. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). ____________________________ Paul J. Barbadoro United States District Judge Date: July 24, 2023 cc: Pablo Emiliano Suescun, pro se Michael McCormack, AUSA /s/Paul Barbadoro Case 1:23-cv-00168-PB Document 8 Filed 07/24/23 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.