Emrit v. Combs et al

1:24-cv-00038Nhd01.05.2024

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Ronald Satish Emrit
v.
Sean P. Diddy Combs, et al.
Case No. 24-cv-38-JL-AJ
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of
Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated February 20, 2024 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United
Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health &
Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792
F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's
report will waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Date: May 1, 2024
cc: Ronald Satish Emrit, pro se
Case 1:24-cv-00038-JL-AJ Document 9 Filed 05/01/24 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.