Randall v. Rodriguez et al

1:24-cv-00195Nhd08.10.2024

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Ryan Randall
v.
Joshua Rodriguez, et al
Case No. 24-cv-195-SE-TSM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated
September 18, 2024. For the reasons explained therein, this case is
dismissed without prejudice. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by
the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the
district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded
on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d
554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health &
Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United
States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper
notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report
will waive the right to appeal).
The clerk shall enter judgment and close this case.
____________________________
Samantha D. Elliott
United States District Judge
Date: October 8, 2024
cc: Ryan Randall, pro se
Case 1:24-cv-00195-SE-TSM Document 4 Filed 10/08/24 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.