Staples et al v. Governor, NH, State of et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Staples et al.
v.
Governor, NH, State of et al.
Case No. 24-cv-331-LM-TSM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated August
25, 2025 . 	“[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to
the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.”
Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10 (1st Cir. 2023)
(quoting Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564
(1st Cir. 2010)); see also Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d
163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016) (“[P]arties who fail to file objections to a
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation lose their right to
appellate review.”).
The defendants’ motion to extend time to answer (doc. 55) is
granted. The plaintiffs’ motion for entry of default and for default
judgment (doc. 57) is denied.
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: October 20, 2025
cc: Frank Staples, pro se
Kathleen Bussiere, pro se
Counsel of Record
Case 1:24-cv-00331-LM-TSM Document 80 Filed 10/20/25 Page 1 of 1