Stewart v. Pike Industries, Inc.

1:25-cv-00115Nhd15.04.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dale Stewart, Jr.
v.
Pike Industries, Inc.
Case No. 25-cv-115-LM-TSM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated March
19, 2026 . 	“[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to
the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court
and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.”
Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10 (1st Cir. 2023)
(quoting Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564
(1st Cir. 2010)); see also Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d
163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016) (“[P]arties who fail to file objections to a
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation lose their right to
appellate review.”).
The defendant’s motion to dismiss (doc. no. 13) is granted and
this case is dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(b), for failure to prosecute.
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: April 15, 2026
Cc: Dale Stewart, Jr., pro se
Counsel of Record
Case 1:25-cv-00115-LM-TSM Document 15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.