1:25-cv-00302•Roosevelt v. Ellis
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Theodore Roosevelt v. Sarah Ellis Case No. 25-cv-302-JL-TSM ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated December 3, 2025. “[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10 (1st Cir. 2023) (quoting Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)); see also Santos-Santos v. Torres- Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016) (“[P]arties who fail to file objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation lose their right to appellate review.”). ____________________________ Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge Date: February 9, 2026 cc: Theodore Rossevelt, pro se Case 1:25-cv-00302-JL-TSM Document 5 Filed 02/09/26 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.