Sullivan v. Pacheo et al

1:26-cv-00070Nhd02.03.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Jack Sullivan
v.
Carmen Pacheo, et al
Case No. 26-cv-70-SM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated
February 9, 2026, for the reasons set forth therein. “[O]nly those
issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are
subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by
such objection are precluded on appeal.” 	Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus
Line, Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10 (1st Cir. 2023) (quoting Sch. Union No. 37
v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)); see also
Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016)
(“[P]arties who fail to file objections to a magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation lose their right to appellate review.”).
The clerk of court shall enter judgment and close the case.
So Ordered.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: March 2, 2026
cc: 	Jack Sullivan, pro se
Case 1:26-cv-00070-SM-TSM Document 4 Filed 03/02/26 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.