Kulke v. Sopheon Corporation et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------X
Deanne Kulke,
Plaintiff,
-against-
Sopheon Corporation, and
Greg Coticchia,
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------X
RAMÓN E. REYES, JR., District Judge:
In a report and recommendation dated December 23, 2025, (ECF No. 34 (“R&R”)),
Magistrate Judge James R. Cho recommended that the Court deny defendant Sopheon’s
motion to strike certain paragraphs in plaintiff’s Complaint. (Id.) Judge Cho advised the
parties that they had fourteen days from the date that R&R was received to file objections.
(Id.) To date, neither party has filed an objection to the R&R, and the time to do so has
passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court
has reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, adopts the R&R in its entirety.
See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Therefore, it is
ordered that the R&R is adopted in its entirety and the motion to strike (ECF No. 16) is
denied.
SO ORDERED.
RAMÓN E. REYES, JR.
United States District
Judge
Dated: January 8, 2026
Brooklyn, New York
ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
25-CV-1218 (RER) (JRC)
/s/ Ramón E. Reyes, Jr.
Case 1:25-cv-01218-RER-JRC Document 35 Filed 01/08/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>