Real America, Inc.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
In Re:
Real America, Inc.,
Debtor.
) 	Case No. 12-31142
)
) 	Chapter 11
)
)
) 	JUDGE MARY ANN WHIPPLE
ORDER
On May 25, 2012, the court entered a preliminary order, [Doc. # 97], after an evidentiary hearing
on a motion filed by Debtor for relief from the court’s May 9, 2012, order granting Citizens Bank relief from
stay and abandonment of its collateral, [Doc. # 78]. The May 9, 2012, order was entered under the default
provisions in the court’s agreed interim order authorizing use of cash collateral, [Doc. # 75], and as a result
of Debtor failing to make timely the adequate protection payment to Citizens Bank required under the
interim cash collateral order.
In its May 25 order, the court vacated, effective immediately, its May 9 order abandoning Citizens’
collateral but conditioned entry of an order vacating relief from the automatic stay on Debtor paying the
reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses, including the fees and expenses of the state court receiver and his
counsel, that were incurred by Citizens through May 22, 2012, as a proximate result of Debtor’s failure to
make timely the required adequate protection payment. At the hearing on its motion, Debtor clarified that
the record of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
of this court the document set forth below. This document has been entered electronically in
The court incorporates by reference in this paragraph and adopts as the findings and orders
Dated: May 31 2012
12-31142-maw Doc 107 FILED 05/31/12 ENTERED 05/31/12 14:53:52 Page 1 of 6

the procedural basis for asking the court to vacate its May 9, 2012, order was Rule 60(b)(1) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, which applies in this proceeding under Rule 9024 of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure.
Under Rule 60(b), courts are authorized “[o]n motion and just terms” to relieve a party from a final
order if any one of six substantive grounds for relief apply. The court rendered oral findings of fact and
conclusions of law at the hearing determining that Debtor established grounds for relief under Rule 60(b)(1)
for mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect in its undisputed default that resulted in the court’s May 9
order. But the court also determined that “just terms” required that vacating the May 9 order be conditioned
on rectifying the monetary prejudice resulting from Debtor’s default in the terms of the agreed cash
collateral order and Citizens Bank’s reliance on the May 9 order in the interim in reviving its collection
efforts against Debtor through the pending pre-petition state court action and receivership. Hritz v. Woma
Corp., 732 F.2d 1178, 1182 n.3 (3d Cir. 1984); Morisse v. Defensive Instruments, Inc., 55 F.R.D. 433, 435
(E.D. Wis. 1972 (payment of plaintiff’s counsel fee a proper condition to Rule 60(b) vacation of judgment);
BN1 Telcomms., Inc. v. Fireworks of America Ltd. Corp. (In re BN1 Telcomms., Inc.), 236 B.R. 238, 242
(Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1999)(imposing reimbursement of attorney’s fees as a condition of vacating a default
judgment); Iowa Oil Co. v. T Mart, Inc. (In re Iowa Oil Co.), 299 B.R. 555, 563 (Bankr. N.D. 	Iowa
2003)(same). In order to implement this condition, the court directed Citizens Bank to file an itemization
of the claimed above- described fees and expenses by May 30, 2012. That itemization having been filed,
[Doc. # 105], and having reviewed the fees and expenses set forth therein, as discussed below, the court
finds fees in the total amount of $6,847.50 and expenses in the total amount of $194.00 to be reasonable
and to have been reasonably incurred as a result of Debtor’s failure to make timely the adequate protection
payment.
DISCUSSION
Citizens Bank has submitted an itemization of fees and expenses that includes (1) attorney fees of
Hunter and Schank Co., L.P.A., which represents Citizens in this bankruptcy case, (2) state court receiver
fees and expenses, and (3) attorney fees incurred by the receiver. The total fees and expenses on the
itemization are $10,097.00.
Prior to commencement of this Chapter 11 case by Real America, Inc., a foreclosure action had been
commenced in state court to foreclose liens on property owned by Debtor, as well as property owned by
U.S. Erie Islands Development LLC (“Erie Islands”) on Middle Bass Island in Ottawa County, Ohio, and
2
12-31142-maw Doc 107 FILED 05/31/12 ENTERED 05/31/12 14:53:52 Page 2 of 6

a receiver had been appointed. Together, the property subject to the foreclosure action is known as St.
Hazard’s Resort. The receivership included assets owned by Real America, Erie Islands and Hazards
Adventures Company. 	Only Real America filed for bankruptcy relief with the commencement of this
voluntary Chapter 11 case on March 15, 2012. Thus, the state court receivership continued with respect to
the other entities and assets. The court draws its facts in this regard from on the evidence and facts from
a prior extensive evidentiary hearing held on April 2, 2012, on a motion to dismiss filed by the United
States Trustee and on a motion to excuse the receiver’s compliance, as a custodian, with 11 U.S.C. § 543.
With this background in mind, the court reviews the statement of fees of counsel for Citizens, the
state court receiver and counsel for the receiver. 	Generally, in determining the reasonableness of a
professionals’ fees and expenses, the court considers its Guidelines for Compensation and Expense
Reimbursement of Professionals (“Guidelines”). Under those guidelines, time entries must identify the
matter involved and the services rendered. 	“Mere notations of telephone calls, conferences, research,
drafting, etc., without appropriately identifying the matter involved, may result in disallowance of the
applicable time.” 	Guidelines, ¶ 9.1 Also, when separate tasks are performed on a single day, the time
required for each task must be disclosed. Id. at ¶ 10. The court applies these guidelines in reviewing the
fees submitted in order to determine whether fees and expenses submitted are those that resulted from
Debtor’s failure to make timely the adequate protection payment required by the court’s agreed interim cash
collateral order.2
The court finds that the fees of Hunter and Schank Co., L.P.A., (“Hunter and Schank”) in the amount
of $860.50 are reasonable and were reasonably and proximately incurred as a result of Debtor’s failure to
make timely the required adequate protection payment. Hunter and Schank are experienced bankruptcy
counsel in this court, a fact that shows in itemization of its fees. Its fee statement complies with the
Guidelines, and the hourly rates of $200 for the assigned attorney and $90 for the assigned paralegal are
reasonable and well within the range of hourly rates for attorney’s fees routinely reviewed and approved
by this court. 	Individual tasks are specific as to the nature of the services rendered and multiple tasks
undertaken on one day are separated and itemized. Each task relates directly to Debtor’s default under the
1 The Guidelines are found at www.ohnb.uscourts.gov, by following “Attorney Information” and “Compensation
Guidelines.”
2 This analysis is for the specific purposes indicated in this order. Nothing in this order is intended to limit or affect the
state court’s routine review and approval of the receivership fees and expenses to the extent not otherwise paid through this series
of order in this court.
3
12-31142-maw Doc 107 FILED 05/31/12 ENTERED 05/31/12 14:53:52 Page 3 of 6

cash collateral order, implementing the default provisions of the order and then coordinating and responding
to the aftermath, including Debtor’s motion for relief from the May 9 order. 	The court finds that Citizens
Bank is prejudiced if the May 9 order is vacated and it has to bear Hunter and Schank’s fees incurred in
reasonable reliance on two orders of this court.
However, with respect to state court receiver Mark Abood’s (“Abood”) fees and expenses and those
of Ziegler Metzger LLP (“Ziegler Metzger”) of Cleveland, Ohio, as counsel for the receiver, the court finds
certain adjustments are necessary. The adjustments and exceptions are noted below. The hourly rates are
not clearly stated in the fee statements, nor are the professionals indentified by name and status as attorney’s
or paralegals. The court is familiar with “KWR” of Ziegler Metzger as being Kirk Roessller, who is
appointed counsel for Abood, and can extrapolate the hourly rates from the fee statements. The court also
infers from those rates that the other two Ziegler Metzger individuals rendering services to Abood whose
initials appear on the statement are lawyers. Abood brings a background in both law and accounting to his
position as receiver, and his fee statement is calculated at an hourly rate of $190. Roessler’s hourly rate is
$250 and the fees for the other two individuals billing time to the account are calculated at an hourly rate
of $225. While this court is not familiar with their qualifications and experience as it is with Hunter and
Schank’s, the hourly rates of Abood and the lawyers are all well within the range of reasonableness for
services of a like nature routinely performed and compensated in this court. Except as stated below, the
court finds that the entries on the respective statements constitute reasonable fees that were reasonably and
proximately 	incurred as a result of Debtor’s failure to 	make timely the required adequate protection
payment and the ensuing May 9 order. And except as stated below, the court finds that the receivership
estate is prejudiced if the May 9 order is vacated and it has to bear Abood’s and Ziegler Metzger’s fees
incurred in reasonable reliance on that order.
RECEIVER’S STATEMENT EXCEPTIONS
$ 2,907.00 	TOTAL STATEMENT AMOUNT FOR FEES
DATE 	TIME 	AMOUNT 	REASON EXCEPTED
05/07/12 	.50 	$ 	95.00 	Date before order. Nature of hearings as related to default
unclear from general description.
05/08/12 	.70 	$ 	133.00 	Date before order. Nature of phone calls as related to default
unknown from general description.
4
12-31142-maw Doc 107 FILED 05/31/12 ENTERED 05/31/12 14:53:52 Page 4 of 6

05/09/12 	2.00 	$ 	380.00 	Hearing in state court on same date order entered.
Prescheduled hearing on non-debtor receivership estates not
primarily related to default.
05/14/12 	.70 	$ 	133.00 	Nature of phone calls, e-mails, research as related to default
unknown from general service description.
05/17/12 	1.30 	$ 	247.00 	Nature of phone calls, e-mails, letter as related to default
unknown from general service description.
05/18/12 	.80 	$ 	152.00 	Nature of phone calls, e-mails, letter as related to default
unknown from general service description.
6.00 	$ 1,140.00 	TOTALS FOR RECEIVER FEES EXCEPTED
$ 1,767.00 	TOTAL FEES INCLUDED BY COURT
COUNSEL’S STATEMENT EXCEPTIONS
$ 6,035.00 	TOTAL STATEMENT AMOUNT
DATE 	TIME 	AMOUNT 	REASON EXCEPTED
05/11/12 	.10 	$ 	25.00 	Service description too general to connect to default services.
05/14/12 	.40 	$ 	100.00 	Nature of correspondence from receiver as related to default
unknown from service description.
05/15/12 	2.30 	$ 	517.50 	Liquor license not a Real America asset. Related to ongoing
receivership estate.
05/16/12 	.80 	$ 	180.00 	Liquor license not a Real America asset. Related to ongoing
receivership estate.
05/18/12 	.70 	$ 	157.50 	Liquor license not a Real America asset. Related to ongoing
receivership estate.
05/21/12 	.10 	$ 	25.00 	Nature of correspondence from receiver as related to default
unknown from service description.
5
12-31142-maw Doc 107 FILED 05/31/12 ENTERED 05/31/12 14:53:52 Page 5 of 6

05/22/12 	3.60 	$ 	810.00 	Lump description of services related to default (villa/RV
rentals) and services not related to default (liquor permit
issues). No basis for determining fees for related services.
8.00 	$ 1,815.00 	TOTALS FOR COUNSEL’S FEES EXCEPTED
$ 4,220.00 	TOTAL FEES INCLUDED BY COURT
Abood’s statement also includes a request for reimbursement of expenses in the total amount of
$293.50. Of that amount, the mileage requested for his travel from Cleveland, Ohio of $199.00 will be cut
in half to account for exception of the fees for the May 9, 2012, hearing in Ottawa County Common Please
Court, resulting in total included expenses of $194.00.
In summary, the court finds that “just terms” as a condition for vacation of the May 9, 2012, court
order require Debtor to pay from a permitted source(s) other than Citizens Bank’s cash collateral the total
amount of 	$7,041.50 calculated as follows:
PROFESSIONAL 	INCLUDED AMOUNT
Hunter and Schank Co., L.P.A. Fees 	$ 	860.50
Mark Abood Fees 	$ 1,767.00
Mark Abood Expenses 	$ 	194.00
Ziegler Metzger LLP Fees 	$ 4,220.00
TOTAL 	$ 7,041.50
THEREFORE, for good cause shown and based on the foregoing reasons, and further in accordance
with the court’s May 25, 2012, preliminary order,
IT IS ORDERED that a final order vacating the court’s May 9, 2012, Order Granting Relief from
Stay and Abandonment will be entered only on condition that, on or before June 5, 2012, Debtor pay to the
specified professionals the attorney fees and receiver fees and expenses in the total amount of $7,041.50
and file with the court a certification that said payments have been made. If Debtor fails to satisfy timely
this condition, the provisions of the court’s May 9, 2012, order as to abandonment will be reimposed and
Debtor’s motion for relief from that order will be finally denied.
###
6
12-31142-maw Doc 107 FILED 05/31/12 ENTERED 05/31/12 14:53:52 Page 6 of 6