GS Holistic, LLC v. HQ VAPES AND TOBACCO LLC et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Case No. 1:23-cv-00634
GS HOLISTIC,LLC,
Plaintiff,
vs.
HQ Vapes and Tobacco LLC A^/a HQ Vapes
and Smokeshop, et al.,
Defendants.
FINAL JUDGMENT
The Court has before it the Plaintiff, GS HOLISTIC, LLC's Motion for Default Judgment
againstDefendant,HQVapesandTobaccoLLC.HavingconsideredthePlaintiffsMotionandall
documents and evidence attached thereto, and the Court being fully advised, and good cause
shown:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment be entered in
favor ofthe Plaintiffon all claims, and the Defendants are liable to the Plaintiff in the amount of
$151, 002. 69, for which let execution issue.
IT IS FURTHERORDERED,ADJUDGEDAND DECREEDthat Defendant, its agents,
employees, officers, directors, owners, representatives, successor companies, related companies,
and all persons acting in concern or participation with it are pennanently restrained and enjoined
from infringing upon the Stundenglass Marks directly or contributorily, in any manner, including
but not limited to:
(a) Import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, assembly, use, acquisition, purchase,
offer, sale, transfer, brokerage, consignment, distribution, storage, shipment, licensing,
Case: 1:23-cv-00634-WHR Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/08/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>

development, display, delivery, marketing advertising or promotion of the counterfeit
Stundenglass product identified in the complaint and any other unauthorized Stundenglass
product, counterfeit, copy or colorful imitation thereof.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to 15 U. S. C.
§1118. the Defendants, attheir cost, deliver to the Plaintiff for destruction all products, accessories,
labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers, receptacles, advertisements, and other material in their
possession, custody or control bearing any ofthe Stiindenglass Marks.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this court retains jurisdiction over any matter pertaining
to this judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: l0/7/^ 	LJol)E-<- ^. ^^'
United States District Court Judge
Case: 1:23-cv-00634-WHR Doc #: 49 Filed: 10/08/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>