Rudolph v. Harrison Metropolitan Housing Authority et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
ISIS RUDOLPH, SR,
Plaintiff,
v.
HARRISON METROPOLITAN
HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al.,
Defendants.
Civil Action 2:25-cv-757
Judge Algenon L. Marbley
Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Notice to the Court Regarding Discovery
Communications and Request for Coordination of Remaining Discovery (ECF No. 67). Therein,
Plaintiff requests that “any remaining discovery requests from Defendants be coordinated and
served in a consolidated manner whenever possible. Specifically, Plaintiff requests that counsel
for Defendants coordinate the timing of any remaining discovery requests so that Requests for
Production, interrogatories, or other discovery materials are served simultaneously rather than in
a staggered manner.” (Id.)
Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 67) is DENIED. There are only two Defendants in this case
such that keeping track of which party served discovery should not be overly onerous for
Plaintiff, even taking into account her disabilities. Moreover, Defendants’ discovery needs may
not line up in the manner Plaintiff is suggesting. If Plaintiff requires additional time to respond to
Case: 2:25-cv-00757-ALM-CMV Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/12/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>

2
Defendants’ discovery requests, she may move for extensions of time after soliciting
Defendants’ consent as provided for in S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.3(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Chelsey M. Vascura
CHELSEY M. VASCURA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 2:25-cv-00757-ALM-CMV Doc #: 68 Filed: 03/12/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>