3:25-cr-00019•USA v. Brown et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:25-cr-19-2 vs. CHRISTOPHER BROWN, District Judge Michael J. Newman Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry Defendant. ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. No. 102); (2) GRANTING THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF PLEA (Doc. No. 92); (3) ACCEPTING DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS CHARGED IN COUNT 4 OF THE INDICTMENT; AND (4) DEFERRING THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO ACCEPT THE PLEA AGREEMENT UNTIL THE SENTENCING HEARING This criminal case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 102), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea. There being no objections to the well-reasoned Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), the Court ADOPTS the R&R in full. The parties’ joint motion to change plea (Doc. No. 92) is GRANTED, and the Court ACCEPTS Defendant’s plea of guilty as charged in Count 4 of the Indictment, which charges him with knowingly and intentionally distributing 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, and salts of its isomers, in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(l) and (b)(l)(B)(viii). The Court DEFERS the decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the sentencing hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 2, 2026 s/Michael J. Newman Hon. Michael J. Newman United States District Judge Case: 3:25-cr-00019-MJN Doc #: 105 Filed: 03/02/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.