3:25-cv-00141•Sitzes II v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
Sitzes II v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
3:25-cv-00141Ohsd13.01.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON BOBBY GENE SITZES II, Petitioner, : Case No. 3:25-cv-00141 - vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz WARDEN, London Correctional Institution, : Respondent. DECISION AND ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, REINSTATEMENT OF STAY This is an action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus. The case is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion to Renew the Stay of these proceedings pending the outcome of proceedings on his post-conviction petition in the Clark County Common Pleas Court (ECF No. 18). The Court had previously vacated the stay because it had been notified that the Clark County proceedings were completed in that the Common Pleas Court had denied the post- conviction petition and Mr. Sitzes had not appealed (ECF No. 17). In his instant Motion to Renew, Sitzes does not deny the Common Pleas Court has entered judgment and that he has not appealed. Instead he gives as a reason for not appealing that he has never received a copy of the Judgment Entry dismissing the case. At the Court’s request, Respondent’s counsel has obtained and filed a copy of that final judgment (ECF No. 20). Armed with this document, Petitioner can now seek a Case: 3:25-cv-00141-TMR-MRM Doc #: 21 Filed: 01/13/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 delayed appeal from the Second District Court of Appeals. If a delayed appeal is granted, the state court proceedings will not yet be final and the Court will reinstate the stay. If a delayed appeal is not granted, those proceedings will be at an end and there will be no further justification for a stay. Accordingly the Motion to Renew the Stay is denied without prejudice to its renewal if the delayed appeal is granted. Petitioner shall file for a delayed appeal not later than January 31, 2026. January 13, 2026. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge Case: 3:25-cv-00141-TMR-MRM Doc #: 21 Filed: 01/13/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.