Caffey v. Robbins Wrecker Service et al

6:25-cv-00332Oked09.10.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
NATHAN CAFFEY,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 25-CV-332-JFH-JAR
ROBBINS WRECKER SERVICE, LLC, et
al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. No. 44] of United States
Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson, who recommends that:
(1) Defendant Robbins Wrecker Service LLC’s Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 17]
be granted, and Plaintiff Nathan Caffey’s claims against Defendant Robbins be
dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction;
(2) Defendant Cherokee Nation District Court’s (“CNDC”) Motion to Dismiss
[Dkt. No. 21] be granted, and Plaintiff’s claims against CNDC be dismissed
with prejudice based on tribal sovereign immunity; and
(3) Defendant Grand River Dam Authority Police’s (“GRDA”) Motion to Dismiss
[Dkt. No. 25] be granted, and Plaintiff’s claims against GRDA be dismissed
without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Neither party objected to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation within the
14-day period prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Having reviewed the Report and
Recommendation, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations and accepts
and adopts it as the order of the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants are
DISMISSED consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of October, 2026.
____________________________________
JOHN F. HEIL, III
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6:25-cv-00332-JFH-JAR Document 45 Filed in ED/OK on 10/09/26 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.