Baugh et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
WESLEY BAUGH and )
CINDY BAUGH, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. CIV-25-417-RAW-JAR
)
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY )
COMPANY, et al., )
)
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
Before the court is the Report and Recommendation (#40) of the
United States Magistrate Judge, in which he recommended that plaintiffs’
to remand be granted.
No objection has been filed and the time allotted for doing so has
expired. “In the absence of a timely objection, the district court may
review a magistrate’s report under any standard it deems appropriate.”
Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir.1991). The court
agrees with the reasoning of the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and
recommendation and finds that “there is no clear error on the face of the
record.” See Rule 72(b) F.R.Cv.P., advisory committee note.
6:25-cv-00417-RAW-JAR Document 42 Filed in ED/OK on 03/20/26 Page 1 of 2

It is the order of the court that the Report and Recommendation
(#40) is affirmed and adopted as the order of the court. The motion of
plaintiffs (#16) to remand is granted. This action is remanded to the
District Court for Pittsburg County, State of Oklahoma.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of MARCH, 2026.
_________________________________
RONALD A. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
6:25-cv-00417-RAW-JAR Document 42 Filed in ED/OK on 03/20/26 Page 2 of 2