Bey v. Midwest City City of et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
ALI ALI-BEY, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. CIV-24-828-G
)
CITY OF MIDWEST CITY )
et al., )
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
In August of 2024, Plaintiff Ali Ali-Bey initiated this case through the filing of a
pro se civil rights Complaint (Doc. No. 1). On August 12, 2025, the Court dismissed this
matter and entered judgment. See Order of Aug. 12, 2025 (Doc. No. 13); J. (Doc. No. 14).
Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, asking that the Court’s Judgment be set aside
to allow Petitioner to again seek relief in this case via an attached amended complaint. The
Court denied that motion. See Order of Mar. 11, 2026 (Doc. No. 20).
Now before the Court is a document titled “Amended Complaint” (Doc. No. 21)
filed by Plaintiff on March 23, 2026. Because this case has been dismissed and judgment
entered, however, there is no pending “pleading” for which Plaintiff can seek amendment.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a); see also Stine v. Wiley, No. 06-cv-02105, 2010 WL 3516634, at *1
(D. Colo. Aug. 10, 2010) (R. & R.) (explaining that a dismissal without prejudice allows a
plaintiff, if appropriate, to “file a new case addressing the issues raised in prior dismissed
case” but not to “reopen” the dismissed case), adopted, 2010 WL 3516628 (D. Colo. Sept.
1, 2010).
Case 5:24-cv-00828-G Document 22 Filed 04/03/26 Page 1 of 2

2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Doc. No. 21 is STRICKEN from the case
record.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of April, 2026.
Case 5:24-cv-00828-G Document 22 Filed 04/03/26 Page 2 of 2