HARVIN et al v. CARVANA LLC et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JENNINGS, et al. 	:
: 	CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiffs, 	:
v. 	:
:
CARVANA, LLC, 	: 	NO. 21-5400
:
Defendant. 	:
HARVIN, et al. 	:
: 	CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiffs, 	:
v. 	:
:
CARVANA, LLC, et al. 	: 	NO. 23-2068
:
Defendants. 	:
ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2026, upon consideration of Defendant Carvana,
LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 97), Plaintiffs’ response in opposition (ECF No. 102), and
Defendant’s reply (ECF No. 103), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. 	The Motion is GRANTED only to the extent Plaintiffs’ UTPCPL claim in Count II is
premised on Plaintiffs’ “double-dipping” theory— i.e., that Defendants allegedly
included a delivery or transit related charge in the vehicle’s cash price and then charged
that same amount again as a separate “Transit Charge.”
2. 	Plaintiffs’ duplicative charging theory is DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. 	The Motion is DENIED in all other respects.
Case 2:23-cv-02068-MRP Document 124 Filed 01/06/26 Page 1 of 2

BY THE COURT:
______________________
HON. MIA R. PEREZ
Case 2:23-cv-02068-MRP Document 124 Filed 01/06/26 Page 2 of 2