SANTUCCI v. BOROUGH OF UPLAND et al

2:25-cv-05172Paed15.04.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CARMEN SANTUCCI,
Plaintiff,
v.
BOROUGH OF UPLAND, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 25-5172
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2026, upon consideration of Carmen
Santucci’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 41), the Borough of Upland and Richard
Slifer’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 42), Walter Omlor’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt.
No. 43), Santucci’s responses (Dkt. Nos. 44, 45 & 46) and Omlor’s reply (Dkt. No. 47), it
is ORDERED the Motions are GRANTED. The Amended Complaint is dismissed
with prejudice and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
Gerald J. Pappert, J.
Case 2:25-cv-05172-GJP Document 49 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.